McCain calls for Strengthening the NPT through Disarmament
Email | Digg! Digg | Del.icio.us

On the heels of his trip to the middle east, John McCain is billed to give a major foreign policy address today. The Washington Post got its hands on some highlights.

"The United States cannot lead by virtue of its power alone," McCain said. Instead, the country must lead by attracting others to its cause, demonstrating the virtues of freedom and democracy, defending the rules of an international civilized society, and creating new international institutions to advance peace and freedom, he said.

"If we lead by shouldering our international responsibilities and pointing the way to a better and safer future for humanity ... it will strengthen us to confront the transcendent challenge of our time: the threat of radical Islamic terrorism," said McCain.

Naturally, "creating new international institutions" catches my attention. Later in the article, it seems that McCain is referring to building a coalition of democracies and renewing American commitment to nuclear disarmament through strengthening the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. For a thorough explanation of why this first idea may be problematic, I'll encourage readers to (pre) order Matt Yglesias' new book Heads in the Sand. Meanwhile, it's really encouraging to see McCain throw his support behind not just disarmament, but the NPT in general.

The Nuclear Non-Proliferation treaty, created in 1968, maintains that nuclear weapons proliferation can only be curtailed if nuclear countries make moves toward disarmament and the rest of the world be allowed to access civilian nuclear technology. However, this "three pillar" strategy has taken a beating in recent years, in part because some nuclear powers have largely ignored its disarmament protocols in pursuit of so-called tactical nuclear weapons. Re-affirming American support for nuclear disarmament is not only a good thing on its own, but it helps to strengthen our entire international non-proliferation regime. Supporting the NPT-- which means abiding by its precepts and working with allies to raise the costs of non-compliance -- is critical to curtailing the global spread of nuclear weapons.

Comments

A draft model treaty for the global elimination of nuclear weapons (a model Nuclear Weapons Convention) was submitted by Costa Rica to the United Nations in 1997 as a discussion draft (UN Doc. A/C.1/52/7 (1997).
If a new US president put his/her mind to it, we could have a nuclear weapons-free world by 2020.

Posted by: stuart at March 28, 2008 9:25 AM

an update and better version of a model Nuclear Weapon Convention (please remember that the others 2 WMD are already banned with the Chemical and with the Biological Conventions) was submitted at the last NPT meeting in Vienna in 2007

Posted by: George at March 31, 2008 4:48 PM

an update and better version of a model Nuclear Weapon Convention (please remember that the others 2 WMD are already banned with the Chemical and with the Biological Conventions) was submitted at the last NPT meeting in Vienna in 2007

Posted by: George at March 31, 2008 4:51 PM

an update and better version of a model Nuclear Weapon Convention (please remember that the others 2 WMD are already banned with the Chemical and with the Biological Conventions) was submitted at the last NPT meeting in Vienna in 2007

Posted by: George at March 31, 2008 4:52 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

February 22, 2008


Stiffing the Blue Helmets
Email | Digg! Digg | Del.icio.us

This op-ed originally appeared in The Guardian

Today, at the end of his week-long jaunt through Africa, President Bush stops in Liberia, the war-torn east African country, to highlight that country's democratic transition. Two weeks prior to his visit, though, the president imperilled Liberia and other emerging democracies by releasing a budget request that significantly shortchanged UN peacekeeping, which over the last seven years has been the main vehicle by which African conflicts have become African democracies. This is not only disingenuous, but it is an incredibly shortsighted move.

More.

Related Posts
Archives
April 2008
S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005