One Problem With A "League of Democracies"
Email | Digg! Digg | Del.icio.us

Mark is right to call attention to the "new international institutions" that John McCain alluded to in his speech today. In proposing a "League of Democracies" -- an idea that, interestingly, resembles a Bush administration proposal from September 2005 -- McCain's speech very neatly mirrors the foreign policy address he gave at the Hoover Institution over a year ago, when he first launched the idea of an organization that "could act where the U.N. fails to act." What, exactly, does he have in mind? Straight from the horse's mouth, courtesy of an op-ed he wrote in Financial Times last week:

The nations of the Nato alliance and the European Union...must have the ability and the will to act in defence of freedom and economic prosperity. They must spend the money necessary to build effective military and civilian capabilities that can be deployed around the world, from the Balkans to Afghanistan, from Chad to East Timor.

While McCain's commitment to working together with other countries is welcome, his seemingly singular focus on a U.S.-Europe alliance could detract significantly from the objective of international cooperation. True, the UN General Assembly often grapples with tensions between the global "North" and the global "South," between "developed" countries and the "developing" 130 countries in the so-called "G-77." The existence of these tensions -- which often frustrate American objectives -- is not, however, a reason to exclude such a substantial number of states from the global decision-making process.

In the 1950's and 60's, the UN reached a seminal point in its history, welcoming a flood of newly decolonized countries in Asia and Africa. To create an alliance consisting largely of militarily strong ex-colonial powers would be, to say the least, a disturbing development, both philosophically and practically. If as President McCain is serious about working with the rest of the world to address the pressing problems of the day, then he should commit to working with the -- admittedly imperfect, but hugely necessary -- institution that already exists -- the United Nations.

Comments

Actually guys you're mixing apples and oranges here. The McCain proposal, which originally was put forward by Anne Marie Slaughter and a few others on the center-left, is for a League of Democracies. There is considerable debate as to whether its advocates see it as a replacement for the UN or merely as a supplement for those things the UN can't or won't do.

The idea you say it resembles from the Bush Adminsitration is in fact part of a Clinton-era initiative known as the Community of Democracies, an informal periodic get-together of the world's democratic states; to date it has met on four occasions (in Warsaw, Seoul, Santiago, and most recently, last year in Bamako). Among the League's proposals are a Democracy Caucus at the UN and creation of a UN Democracy Fund (which has come to fruition).

Unlike the League, the CoD is very informal. In fact, only in Bamako did its members agree to create a Secretariat. But it illustrates the (Groucho) Marxist question of who should be a member -- much of the planning for its periodic gatherings is devoted to debate among its organizers as to who should and should not be invited.

The Bush Administration has been a vocal supporter of the CoD process. But it has, to be fair, never tried to portray it as a replacement or substitute for the UN. And given that the CoD has regularly failed to agree on almost anything, it illustrates just how difficult creating a more robust version would be.

Posted by: Charlie at March 27, 2008 4:39 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

February 22, 2008


Stiffing the Blue Helmets
Email | Digg! Digg | Del.icio.us

This op-ed originally appeared in The Guardian

Today, at the end of his week-long jaunt through Africa, President Bush stops in Liberia, the war-torn east African country, to highlight that country's democratic transition. Two weeks prior to his visit, though, the president imperilled Liberia and other emerging democracies by releasing a budget request that significantly shortchanged UN peacekeeping, which over the last seven years has been the main vehicle by which African conflicts have become African democracies. This is not only disingenuous, but it is an incredibly shortsighted move.

More.

Related Posts
Archives
April 2008
S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005