Meeting the Challenges of International Terrorism
Email | Digg! Digg | Del.icio.us

For the next seven days, UN Dispatch, The Washington Note and On Day One will host an online discussion about international terrorism and offer recommendations for how the next United States president can meet these challenges. Leading this discussion is an international panel of experts on terrorism, counter-terrorism, international law, and national security. We are honored to have Steve Clemons as a moderator and co-host on The Washington Note.

Our panel of experts (full bios here) include:

Peter Bergen, New America Foundation

Paul Cruickshank, NYU Center on Law and Security

Greg Djerejian, The Belgravia Dispatch

Stephanie Kaplan, Woodrow Wilson Center

Matthew Levitt, Washington Institute on Near East Policy

Alastair Millar, Center on Global Counter Terrorism Cooperation

Eric Rosand, Center on Global Counter Terrorism Cooperation

Yosri Fouda, Al Jazeera

Stay tuned for the first discussion prompt.


Comments

The United States is incredibly fond of characterizing every effort as a war on something or other. War on Poverty, War on Drugs, etc ad nauseam.

In the case of terrorism, clearly perpetrated by criminals , their motives not withstanding, is clearly the purview of law enforcement agencies.

In the US Mr Bush acted on his political and egotistical motivation and added yet another "war" to the lengthy list currently in vogue.

I know of no credible positive contribution by the military in the struggle against terrorism in any country. Terrorist acts are criminal acts. They should be treated as such.

Posted by: Philip B Fregeau at July 29, 2008 3:45 PM

I believe that any discussion on the War On Terror that does not include alternative energy and what average American’s can do to eliminate the use of petroleum products is like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. The terrorists’ most important weapon is the fact that we are addicted to oil. If we eliminate—or at least reduce—our use of oil and oil based products we take that weapon away from them.
The present administration managed to disguise the War In Iraq with the War On Terror and thus has asked nothing of the average American. After 9-11 I fully expected gas to be rationed because that is what terrorists old over our heads. The Bush Administration has wanted to conduct its wars without inconvenience to Americans so they wouldn’t look too closely at why we’re fighting in Iraq and who’s making the money.

Posted by: Stephanie K. Frieze at July 30, 2008 2:00 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

October 10, 2008


A U.S.-UN History Lesson in Georgia
Email | Digg! Digg | Del.icio.us

(The following was originally written in August 2008.)

Commentators looking to explain the recent Russo-Georgian conflict by analyzing American foreign policy have found no dearth of candidate provocations. America's support for Georgian membership in NATO, its recognition of Kosovo's independence, and its open planning to install missile defense programs in Eastern Europe all likely contributed to Russia's willingness to exert its influence in the region by force. By and large, however, these speculations have focused on the proximate causes of the past few months. The most significant American contribution to instability in Georgia, however, may actually have occurred some 15 years ago--and its story provides more resounding lessons for U.S.-UN policy than it does for U.S.-Russia relations.

More.

Dispatch Tweets
UN Dispatch's full feed
Related Posts