SORT BY 
ISSUES
WRITERS
DATE
3 posts in the last 24 hours
Suggest a post:
undispatch@gmail.com
Get help:
Report a problem
The Non-Proliferation Benefits of the Low U.S. Dollar

RT @SayNO_UNiTE: RT @safeworld4women: YOU can support #IVAWA (International Violence Against Women Act) http://is.gd/7DXw5
from UNIFEM
New Blog Post: #Peacekeeping -- International Forum Helps Turn Talk into Action http://bit.ly/cPTDEY
from DipNote
I posted 14 photos on Facebook in the album "UNIC Memorials for Haiti Earthquake" http://bit.ly/aVrjeG
from UN


|
|
|
Visitor:
1 Feb 3:39pm
We are shipowners and we like to offer our vessel to the responsible agency
for contracting vessels
read more
Visitor:
26 Jan 1:15pm
WHo is this idiot? Tom Miller, president and CEO of the United Nations
Association of the United Sta
read more
Visitor:
26 Jan 4:16am
Haiti,Haiti, world waves, there are a survivalsituation, water, fire(energy),
shelter(whetherdefence
read more
Visitor:
25 Jan 10:17am
We have to keep Haiti in the news
read more
Visitor:
24 Jan 1:57pm
I think only good buildings will help them to prevent the disaster
read more
Visitor:
23 Jan 11:15am
Como podemos Ayudarsi El personal de las Naciones Unidas o la Fundación no
correso respoden los
read more

Final Durban Thoughts
John Boonstra - April 24, 2009 - 2:06 pm
Haiti Earthquake
Mark Leon Goldberg - January 12, 2010 - 5:52 pm
One Laptop Per Child - The Dream is Over
Alanna Shaikh - September 9, 2009 - 8:06 am
The Coup Caucus
Mark Leon Goldberg - July 7, 2009 - 11:05 am








DISPATCH TWEETS






Mark Leon Goldberg - December 22, 2008 - 5:45 pm
In September 2006 billionaire investment guru Warren Buffett joined forces with the Nuclear Threat Initiative (a sister organization to the UN Foundation, which sponsors this blog) to kick start the creation of a "nuclear fuel bank" at the International Atomic Energy Agency. The idea behind a nuclear fuel bank is pretty simple: countries that seek civilian nuclear power must either a) import low-enriched uranium or b) enrich their own uranium. From a country's perspective, b is generally preferable because it means they are not dependent on external sources of enriched uranium. From a non-proliferation perspective, however, b is worrisome because once countries start enriching their own uranium, it could be only a matter of time until they decide to use that technology to create weapons-grade uranium.
A "nuclear fuel bank" would theoretically obviate the need for countries to enrich their own uranium because the bank would provide a back-up supply of low-enriched uranium should the importer's supply become disrupted. It is sort of an insurance policy for countries that chose to not develop their own uranium enrichment technologies. It also helps take away the incentive for developing the kind of uranium enrichment technologies that could eventually yield nuclear weapons.
The idea to create a nuclear fuel bank has been around for decades, but in 2006 Buffet breathed new life into it by promising $50 billion to the IAEA as a seed investment to start the bank. His pledge was conditioned on IAEA member states raising $100 million in matching funds by the end of 2008.
So far, the United States pledged $50 million, and Norway and the United Arab Emirates pledged $15 million. It looked like the European Union's pledge of 25 million euros would leave the bank just shy of the $100 million mark. Then this happened:
So there you have it. The declining dollar to the rescue.