SORT BY 
ISSUES
WRITERS
DATE
4 posts in the last 24 hours
Suggest a post:
undispatch@gmail.com
Get help:
Report a problem
Khalilzad's "Exit Interview"

RT @SayNO_UNiTE: RT @safeworld4women: YOU can support #IVAWA (International Violence Against Women Act) http://is.gd/7DXw5
from UNIFEM
New Blog Post: #Peacekeeping -- International Forum Helps Turn Talk into Action http://bit.ly/cPTDEY
from DipNote
I posted 14 photos on Facebook in the album "UNIC Memorials for Haiti Earthquake" http://bit.ly/aVrjeG
from UN


|
|
|
Visitor:
1 Feb 3:39pm
We are shipowners and we like to offer our vessel to the responsible agency
for contracting vessels
read more
Visitor:
26 Jan 1:15pm
WHo is this idiot? Tom Miller, president and CEO of the United Nations
Association of the United Sta
read more
Visitor:
26 Jan 4:16am
Haiti,Haiti, world waves, there are a survivalsituation, water, fire(energy),
shelter(whetherdefence
read more
Visitor:
25 Jan 10:17am
We have to keep Haiti in the news
read more
Visitor:
24 Jan 1:57pm
I think only good buildings will help them to prevent the disaster
read more
Visitor:
23 Jan 11:15am
Como podemos Ayudarsi El personal de las Naciones Unidas o la Fundación no
correso respoden los
read more

Final Durban Thoughts
John Boonstra - April 24, 2009 - 2:06 pm
Haiti Earthquake
Mark Leon Goldberg - January 12, 2010 - 5:52 pm
One Laptop Per Child - The Dream is Over
Alanna Shaikh - September 9, 2009 - 8:06 am
The Coup Caucus
Mark Leon Goldberg - July 7, 2009 - 11:05 am








DISPATCH TWEETS






Mark Leon Goldberg - January 14, 2009 - 6:10 pm
Just returning from and event at the New America Foundation in Washington, DC in which Steve Clemons played host/inquisitor/moderator to a discussion with outgoing United States ambassador to the United Nations Zalmay Khalilzad.
Khalilzad reflected that the United Nations was a "net positive" for the United States. He said he came into the job believing that "the United States needs the United Nations and the United Nations needs the United States" and left feeling the exact same way. When asked about his personal diplomatic style he responded that treating colleagues like equals -- even those from small nations -- can go a long way toward earning the United States the kind of trust and support that is required to effectively advance American interests at the United Nations.
Perhaps the newsiest bit came when Khalilzad addressed the controversy surrounding the United States abstention from the Gaza ceasefire resolution. He said that Rice spent an "unprecedented" three days working on the resolution, and that the United States drafted a big portion of the resolution, which he described as "very reasonable." He then made two somewhat contradictory points. 1) That there was an imperative to pass a resolution before Friday evening prayers in the Arab world because the United States feared that not doing so could result in violence directed at its embassies in the Middle East. 2) That the ultimate decision to abstain from the resolution was done to give ongoing Franco-Egyptian diplomatic efforts more time.
What's curious to me, at least, is why the United States would not vote in favor of a resolution that its ambassador considered "very reasonable" and its Secretary of State worked so hard on drafting?
Still, it is hard not to like and respect Ambassador Khalilzad, who brought a level of competency and passion to three critical posts in US government- ambassador to Afghanistan, Iraq and the United Nations. He is unsure what his future holds, though he did rule out running for president of his native Afghanistan. He does, however, want to be an advocate for the people of Afghanistan and help that country in anyway he can. He suggested that he may work on projects related to education in Afghanistan. All the power to him.