Site Meter Human Rights in Ethiopia? Meh | UN Dispatch
Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size

Human Rights in Ethiopia? Meh

Bill Easterly joins forces with an impressive group of human rights activists and civic leaders to call for the release of an Ethiopian journalist detained for publishing things the Ethiopian government does not want to hear:

On September 14, 2011, Eskinder Nega, an Ethiopian journalist and dissident blogger, was arrested by the Ethiopian authorities shortly after publishing an online column calling for an end to torture in Ethiopian prisons, a halt to the imprisonment of dissidents, and respect for freedom of expression. The charges against him are punishable by death, and carry a minimum sentence of fifteen years in prison,1 where both Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch warn that he is at risk of torture.

Previous to his current arrest, Eskinder and his wife Serkalem Fasil, both newspaper publishers, were charged with treason following Ethiopia’s disputed 2005 elections, along with dozens of journalists, human rights activists, and opposition leaders, and spent seventeen months in jail. While in custody, Serkalem gave birth to their first child. Even after they were acquitted by Ethiopia’s Federal High Court, Eskinder and Serkalem were blocked from reopening their newspapers and the government continued to pursue civil charges against them.2

Eskinder also was detained earlier this year, after he published an online column asking members of the security services not to shoot unarmed demonstrators—as they did in 2005—in the event that the “Arab Spring” should spread to Ethiopia.3

The letter, published in the elite-focused, New York Review of Books, calls on the Obama administration to “to publicly repudiate Ethiopia’s efforts to use terrorism laws to silence political dissent…and ensure that our more than $600 million in aid to Ethiopia is not used to foster repression.”

This is an important test for the human rights chops of the Obama administration. Ethiopia is a very important ally in American counter-terrorism efforts in the region. That was the case in the Bush era, but has become even evident in the first three years of the Obama administration. In October, the Washington Post broke the story that the USA had refurbished an airfield in southern Ethiopia from which it launches drone strikes against targets in the Horn of Africa.

All the while, the government of Meles Zenawi is as autocratic as its ever. In parliamentary elections in 2010, his party miraculously won 96% of the vote. The government is even so brazen as to convict two Swedish journalists under anti-terrorism laws for reporting from the restive Ogaden region.  That’s the behavior of a government that does not believe it will be taken to task for human rights abuses–even though the country is heavily reliant on foreign aid.

The supremacy of counter-terrorism objectives in the Horn of Africa over human rights or democratization resulted in a multitude of disasters during the Bush years. It would seem that the Obama administration has done little to change that fundamental focus on counter-terrorism uber-alles.


  • Derege

    Eskinder Nega and several other brave journalists have to be free soon! The Obama administrations cash flow to the Ethiopian gov’t is sustaining the impunity of Meles. He has continued to imprison and torture its people and rig elections under the nose of the US and the European Union. If Obama really cares about the people of Ethiopia/Africa the administration has to catch this opportunity and publicly demand the release of all political prisoners and journalists in Ethiopia.

  • Anonymous

     For a number of reasons, Mr. Easterly is wrong to try to pressure an elected government by using “Aid Money” the US gives as a political tool. Not only are such approaches cruel as they punish the poor but also naïve to expect to bring the desired outcome. Certain individuals and “Human Right advocates” have the temerity to be judgmental including by interfering in the jurisprudence procedure of a sovereign nation or by rejecting the due process outcome if it goes against their likings. If not a neo-colonial mentality, it is an act of interference in the internal affairs of a sovereign country. In any medium, this behavior does not go alongside any democratic credo. One of the essential things Mr. Bill Easterly and the likes should do is having the will to respect (not necessarily accept) the outcome of a progressive law even if the verdict goes against their expectation. Of course there are prudent procedures to dissent, oppose or to make constructive critiques.  Based on the allegation Mr. Bill Easterly made about Ethiopia, it is clear that he is gathering his claims from certain groups or individuals that are lesser informed understandably in the name of “human/individual rights”, or have long held skewed malicious intent for political objective, and this is not healthy discourse. Yes, Ethiopia is gratitude for the assistances it has been getting and the US is entitled to validate the use of the food aid. But linking the food aid we give to feed the poor for political reason is obsolete politics. I am sure the US, Australia and UK embassies in Addis are better informed and more credible on this issue. The Anti-Terror law:As Ethiopia is located in a volatile region of the Horn of Africa, and has repeatedly faced many terrorist acts including the murder of its citizens by barbaric forces that are indifferent to innocent lives, the anti-terror law was enacted adhering to the country’s legislative procedure. In many of its characters, it is similar to that of the US (Patriot Act), Australian and UK laws, and its objective it to preempt terror acts against unarmed population or economic installations. One has to read the UNSC Monitoring Group’s account to understand its helpfulness. If the US, Australia, UK, and other countries are entitled to enact laws to save their people, what is wrong if Ethiopia does the same?   The Two Swedish Journalists: The court finding proved that they aided a terrorist group and entered the country illegally for the said purpose. Both flew to UK to meet with ONLF groups, flew to Kenya, and captured during the war alongside the terrorist ONLF groups. As 15 of the ONLF fighters have been killed during the fight, the two journalists were lucky to escape with minor harm. The Ethiopian legislative body has classified ONLF as a terror group because it has repeatedly slaughtered innocent Ethiopians and its behavior fits the terrorist category. Both were taken to the capital, granted consol and visitation rights, read what they have been accused of and saw the Inculpatory evidences including recorded materials, pectoral and eyewitness accounts. How would Mr. Easterly act if the US court convicts two people that were found sneaking into the US territory along side an armed terror group? How if the court found evidences the intention of the two was to witness and record the actual terror and their capture was in an actual battle?    Although the entire precedent was open to the public (and to the Swedish Embassy staffs and many who came to Addis Ababa) and the court has already given its verdict, the convicted are entitled to ask the country’s higher court to see the case. Eskinder Nega:This case is still in progress and Mr. Easterly should have known better not to infringe in the independent court’s procedures. As of today, the prosecutor has presented its case and the accused has the right to get due process. It is important to note that the Eskinder has the best lawyers and Mr. Bill Easterly should stay, at least, until the court sees the case. Reading to the article, one can say Mr. Bill Easterly is basing his claim on hearsays and there are many well established “members of opposition” in the United States and in Western Europe to feed all sorts of misinformation. Most of those “oppositions” have left Ethiopia before or when the Durg system was removed and we have been hearing and reading their propagandas and preaching’s – all in the name of democracy. In meddling in Ethiopian issue, one has to understand the political chemistry of Ethiopia, its near past and current state including the ardent strides the country is embarking in democracy, development and responsible governance.

  • Sosthulet

    Correction: 99.6% not 96%.  EPRDF (TPLF) claimed 99.6% of the parlament seats in 2010.

  • pern2pete

    for the record, it should be noted that the Washington Post retracted its statement that the US was using an ethiopian airfield to launch drone strikes. the agreement between ethiopia and the u.s. specifies that the drones will be used  exclusively for reconnaissance. 

Diplo Tweets