Foreign Policy’s intrepid reporter Josh Rogin first posted last night on a White House memo in which President Obama exempted four governments from the Child Soldiers Prevention Act, a 2008 bill that bars US military cooperation with countries that recruit child soldiers.   The short presidential directive reads:

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, pursuant to section 404(c) of the Child Soldiers Prevention Act of 2008 (CSPA), title IV of the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 (Public Law 110 457), I hereby determine that it is in the national interest of the United States to waive the application to Chad, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Sudan, and Yemen of the prohibition in section 404(a) of the CSPA.

I just spoke with Jo Becker of Human Rights Watch who told me this “essentially nullifies the law.”  The Child Soldiers Prevention Acts, says Becker, mandates that the State Department list governments that recruit child soldiers. In June 2010, six countries were listed: Chad, DRC, Yemen, Sudan, Somalia and Burma.  By issuing such a sweeping waiver, Becker says the administration has effectively undermined the law.  “It gives us no leverage to deal with the recruitment of child soldiers in these countries,” she says.

Josh Rogin quotes two administration officials who argue that these waivers make it easier for the United States to support genuine efforts to demobilize child soldiers. “These countries have put the right policies in place, but are struggling to effectively implement them,” a state department spokesperson tells Josh Rogin.  “These waivers allow the United States to continue to conduct valuable training programs and by working with these militaries help them meet international norms.”

The bill took effect on October 1, which helps explain the timing of the waiver.  Still, it seems hard to square these two opposing views.   Anyone care to weigh in?

  • Anonymous

    This sounds like a wait-and-see to me (a revisit-in-1-year?), but I am very uncomfortable about it……

  • Sanju Paison

    How to protect child rights from birth itself? Require basic financial capability for parenthood.

  • Kaitlyn Scott

    The Administration’s argument that the waiver will actually help these countries effectively implement policies to demobilize child soldiers and meet international human rights norms seems a little weak to me. The bill already has an “Exception for Programs Directly Related To Addressing the Problem of Child Soldiers or Professionalization of the Military.” Those statements seem to be just a feeble attempt to make the real objective, counter-terrorism even at the expense of human rights, more palatable.

    “(e) Exception for Programs Directly Related To Addressing the Problem of Child Soldiers or Professionalization of the Military-
    (1) IN GENERAL- The President may provide assistance to a country for international military education, training, and nonlethal supplies (as defined in section 2557(d)(1)(B) of title 10, United States Code) otherwise prohibited under subsection (a) upon certifying to the appropriate congressional committees that–
    (A) the government of such country is taking reasonable steps to implement effective measures to demobilize child soldiers in its forces or in government-supported paramilitaries and is taking reasonable steps within the context of its national resources to provide demobilization, rehabilitation, and reintegration assistance to those former child soldiers; and
    (B) the assistance provided by the United States Government to the government of such country will go to programs that will directly support professionalization of the military.”

  • Kagiso3741

    right is right .. wrong is wrong .. when it comes to allowing child soldiers … Obama might as well be Richard Nixon …