How About Creating a New Peace Corps?
I think one way the US -- by way of the White House -- can retake a leadership role in promoting international family planning and women's health during this time of global economic crisis is to build a small army of Social Change Volunteers who would be a modern version of Peace Corp volunteers. And one possible market for volunteers are students, those who want to take a semester abroad, those who aren't finding work in this economy and may consider taking time abroad or even mid-career workers who want to be involved in social change.
Sponsored by the White House, it could be implemented by the UN, but have the signature of the President or the First Lady, much the way JFK kicked off the Peace Corps. The work would focus on fighting poverty by raising the status of women, empowering with training or funds or organization to help them manage their families, the way numerous very good on-the-ground programs are operating.









DISPATCH TWEETS











Karl @ Apr 1st 2009 10:49AM
Or you know what also could be a modern version of Peace Corps Volunteers? Peace Corps Volunteers! They still exist you know, about 7,800 of them world wide at last count, and 195,000 people have served as PCVs since 1961. Slightly more shocking is that some PCVs work in the health sphere, assissting in maternal and child health services.
Even if the Peace Corps didn't exist how can you expect "social change" to be implemented in the course of a single semester? That barely gives enough time for your new army to register culture shock. Nor will it really help in any meaningful way if the bulk of your recruits are people who are looking to get a free vacation from school or just waiting out the economic situation. If real change is going to be implemented you need well-trained, dedicated people who are in this for the long haul.
REPLY »