One case of swine flu, two cases of swine flu...
John Boonstra - July 17, 2009 - 3:22 pm
Eh, who's counting anyway? Not the WHO any more (h/t Passport). But before your flabbergasted reaction -- the World Health Organization is not tracking the number of cases of a disease it has called a pandemic?!? -- consider that this is actually a sensible step.
On the one hand, unfortunately, it's only practical to stop counting; new cases are popping up all over, and, with different countries' reporting standards, keeping track would essentially be a fool's errand. On the other, the number of cases is a much less significant fact than HOW the virus is spreading, and how it is being treated. These, of course, the WHO continues to track rigorously.
There are many cases of swine flu; we know this, and we'll still have a good enough estimate of the number as it grows. But counting the global caseload can lead to a feverish panic over an ever-increasing number. I'd much rather the WHO focus on how to decrease this number.
Subscribe to these comments









DISPATCH TWEETS










jamessmithforum @ Feb 19th 2010 8:24AM
Web Hosting Navi Mumbai |
Web Designing |
Search Engine Optimization |
Data Entry Projects
REPLY »
jamessmithforum @ Feb 19th 2010 8:22AM
Web Hosting | Indian Astrology | Hindu Matrimony
REPLY »
davidgarso @ Feb 16th 2010 9:04AM
I like this woman. She included that all voices within those communities, whether it be directly or through local organizations, must be heard. revizyon ile organize matbaacılık brnckvvtmllttrhaberirevizyon ile organize matbaacılık brnckvvtmllttrhaberirevizyon ile organize matbaacılık brnckvvtmllttrhaberilidaoyun oynaoyun oynafilm izleare particularly vulnerable to discrimination on any other grounds, including gender, ethnicity, or disability."
REPLY »