One Laptop Per Child - The Dream is Over

Alanna Shaikh - September 9, 2009 - 8:06 am

 

(photo credit: laihiu)

The One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) project started out with big dreams. Founded by Nicholas Negroponte of MIT’s media lab, it promised a hundred dollar laptop that would be sold directly to Ministries of Education in huge lots. The laptop, they promised, was the new pencil. It was going to revolutionize education in the developing world.

It didn’t.

The laptop never came down to the hundred dollar price that was promised. The huge orders never materialized, and the project was very slow to allow sales to NGOs and charities instead of just governments. They abandoned the human-powered power source. They abandoned the special child-friendly OS. The laptop still didn’t sell to their target market in the developing world.

Americans wanted the OLPC. We fell in love with its tremendous promise and adorable shape. (note: I own an OLPC) We were the first market it conquered. OLPC launched a give one-get one promotion that let individuals pay $400 to donate one laptop and receive one for themselves. It was a huge success, except that OLPC wasn’t set up for that kind of customer order fulfillment. Laptops arrived far later than promised, and several thousand orders were simply lost.

Once the laptop finally started arriving in the developing world, its impact was minimal. We think. No one is doing much research on their impact on education; discussions are largely theoretical. This we do know: OLPC didn’t provide tech support for the machines, or training in how to incorporate them into education. Teachers didn’t understand how to use the laptops in their lessons; some resented them. Kids like the laptops, but they don’t actually seem to help them learn.

It’s time to call a spade a spade. OLPC was a failure. Businessweek called it two years ago. Now, Timothy Ogden, editor-in-chief of Philanthropy Action has made a compelling argument to give up on OLPC. He points out that supporting de-worming programs has more impact on child learning than the OLPC laptops.  The laptops were designed without end-user input, they cost too much both to produce and to run, and they’re now being outcompeted by commercial laptops. Only about a million OLPCs have shipped so far.

Some people call OLPC Nick Negroponte’s vanity project. I wouldn’t go that far. But it’s not going to change the world, or even affect it all that much. One Laptop per Child got everyone thinking about the education in the developing world. It spawned the commercial laptops that are now out competing it. But that’s all. The dream is over.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2) Subscribe to these comments

sallasmayon @ Feb 7th 2010 4:21PM

Thanks a lot for the kind of perfect topic about this topic. It’s good to buy an essay about e okul this good topic. I Write a good article. Thank you. I'm still waiting for this kind of writing you would always follow. I hope you'll continue to write articles of this aşk sözleri type. But I can not enjoy this beautiful, sometimes in e okul writing. Difficult to reach your site. Ilgilenirmisiniz with this issue. Waiting for your interest in other articles e-okul . In the meantime, I'm trying to improve my English version if you excuse e okul me if I have errors. wish you good work.

REPLY »

ahmet maranki @ Dec 28th 2009 3:08PM

ahmet maranki

REPLY »

bathmateus @ Dec 28th 2009 12:52AM

nice posting......

Bathmate

REPLY »

bath mateus @ Dec 27th 2009 6:35PM

Very impressive posting. I enjoyed it. I think others will like it & find it useful for them. Good luck with your work. ;-)

Bathmate

REPLY »

Visitor @ Dec 26th 2009 3:00AM

nike air max shoes and nike dunk shoes
http://www.tradertrade.com

REPLY »

Visitor @ Dec 26th 2009 2:58AM

nike air max shoes and nike dunk shoes
http://www.tradertrade.com

REPLY »

Program indir @ Dec 19th 2009 2:56PM

The dream is not over. When OLPC started there were no low cost laptops. We created the category less than four years ago and it now represents almost one third of the world production of latops. I am not aware of too many technologies that have gone from “impossible” to such wide adoption

Program indir

REPLY »

Hannah32 @ Dec 19th 2009 3:02AM

Whether we admire it or not, previous in our lives, we would need to carry out term papers and other written activity. It is easily not cinch but very beautiful to produce a investigate about this post. To do that, you need to read a range of articles and books, or you can just order some kind of work and then use online plagiarism finished by http://www.plagiarismsearch.com and save your time like some quick help with the American Dream.

REPLY »

CarlosXO @ Sep 11th 2009 7:56AM

This is a response to Alanna Shalikhʼs post of September 9, 2009 titled “One Laptop Per Child - The Dream is Over”

Will not repeat the excellent points brought by previous responses including Mr. Negroponteʼs.

This is my own personal view, I am one of the over one thousand volunteers working in Uruguay, in a group called Red de Apoyo al Plan Ceibal, RAP Ceibal.

The OLPC plan in Uruguay is well and alive, with no plans to disappear.

One important fact: The main opposition candidate in next month presidential elections, has gone to extremes to explain how good the Plan Ceibal is.

He publicly recognized it as one of the good projects implemented by the current government.

My wife and I lived and worked in New York City for over forty years.

During those years we participated first-hand in the introduction of two new technologies in our business.

In 1983 we introduced the first computer in our office.

In 1997 we started a website and used it as the center for our business.

Those two introductions of new technologies were no different from what we see in Uruguay with the XO computers and Plan Ceibal/OLPC.

The normal reaction of most human beings to any new technology is fear.

And the immediate reaction to fear is rejection.

Yes, a lot of people, have a negative first reaction.

Particularly the older individuals who have had successful careers for many years without the new technology.

Those who repeat their comments without thinking, of course don't help the process of accepting new modern tools.

But technology doesnʼt go away so easily. And much the less when young children without prejudices or fears have tested it, liked it and approved it.

And much the less when those children are all the elementary school students and every year more and more in high school.

They keep the computers after leaving elementary school where they received them as their personal treasure to keep.

We should not worry about those rejecting the idea.

Pretty soon they will see others succeeding and find out they too could succeed.

And those detractors will imitate the leaders.

Let me finish with a success story that makes me very proud.

We recently had the pleasure and honor of helping a school teacher from Uruguay, Fabiana Marella, make a remote presentation of her paper to Squeakfest USA 2009, an international conference at UCLA, University of California at Los Angeles.

Recording of her original presentation:

http://squeakland.org/resources/audioVisual/movie.jsp?id=54

Our spanish version of the same presentation:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0A61eiW7r4annotation_id=annotation_127705...

Carlos Rabassa

REPLY »

danielapapi @ Sep 10th 2009 11:06PM

Note: For anyone using XOs out there: we had someone come in and do a research project on our XO program who helped to match the Cambodian curriculm with XO programs and come up with learning ideas. If you want to learn more about this, contact us at PEPY www.pepyride.org

I think this is a very myopic view on the potential for change OLPC has started. If you had looked at the Apple2e computer I used when I was a kid maybe you would have only seen the basic programs I was using and not see what is possible today. We use the OLPC laptops in Cambodia and when I look at them in use, I see my Apple2e. It's very basic now in some ways, but that's the point. It's opensource. The people in the places that are using these can, will and are developing better and better programs for it.

I have been to the schools the Negropontes sponsor in Cambodia, which was our impetus to apply for laptops through the give-one-get-one program. Spend a day in one of their schools, and I guarantee you will change your mind, at least in terms of the potential for change, based on these tools.

If there was no word "laptop" in the name, they would have gotten a lot less press, but naming it a "learning tool" would have been a more correct choice and perhaps saved them a lot of criticism. It's not a “laptop” meant to replace what you and I are working on. It is a tool for kids to guide them through their own learning - when their teachers don't show up, when there is a huge differentiation between levels in one class, when there are too many students for one-on-one instruction.

I don't agree with Nicholas Negroponte that any child can pick one up and know how to fix the inside. I do agree with Alanna that, for the best learning environment, you need a great teacher or ideally facilitator, but that is the same for anything you are learning. I have seen in our students and the other OLPC programs we work with in Cambodia, that these tools are inspiring children to lead themselves into areas of education that they are not given access to in their normal government classes.

The word "lesson plan" is evil in the constructivism world of Papert followers and the child-led learning model of OLPC. No "how-to" guide is not an accident but was planned. I agree with Alanna that for most people, who have been spoon-fed their knowledge all their lives, they are not capable of making the leap and learning on their own. In a place like Cambodia some of the most educated young people I know are used to that: they teach themselves all they want to learn via the internet. We have found those people make great facilitators for the program and we don’t follow all constructivist methodologies in our classroom, in fact we brought a researcher in to observe and analyze lessons our teachers had developed and to turn those into “lesson plans” (gasp!).

If you really believe "But it’s not going to change the world, or even affect it all that much." you have not made all of the connections to all of the ways it already HAS changed the word. It has some of the newest technologies in environmentally friendly parts, screen visibility in bright light, battery life, mesh-technologies, etc etc... and all of those things are ALREADY changing the world as others take them and continue to improve upon them.

Here in Cambodia, there are groups of young Cambodians who meet regularly to translate OLPC programs into Khmer. The new versions we just got have Khmer script and we are now using Scratch in Khmer as well. Walk into a classroom where we work with and see older students teaching younger students how to read Khmer via the animated Khmer testing program they designed themselves, and you will change your mind a bit. Talk to our computer teachers, young Cambodians who taught themselves how to use the XOs, and yes, they will tell you there is a lot they don't understand, but they are effecting change. You can’t see that from your office, but I can see it here. It's just the start! Each new version of the XO we get is better and better and will continue to be.

If you want to learn more about what we are doing with Scratch on the XOs or about the “lesson plans” our team developed to match the Khmer curriculm, contact us at PEPY www.pepyride.org

REPLY »

Add Your Comments
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image. Ignore spaces and be careful about upper and lower case.
  • Related Sites
  • UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATIONS
  • UN WIRE
  • Join Us On
  • t
  • f