Site Meter UN Dispatch | United Nations News & Commentary Global News – Forum | Page 20
Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size

All Posts

image from flickr user andros, http://www.flickr.com/photos/andross/3882356247/sizes/s/in/photostream/

Top of the Morning: BRICS Agree to Fail to Create a Development Bank; Ntaganda Gets His Day In Court

Top stories from DAWNS Digest.

BRICS Agree to Fail to Create a Development Bank

Though some members were hailing an agreement, key details of a development bank to rival the IMF and World Bank remained elusive. “BRICS nations failed on Tuesday to resolve differences over funding for and the location of a proposed joint development bank, indicating the emerging powers group would not achieve the goal at a summit in South Africa. Agreeing on the share of funding contributions for the BRICS bank from each of the members – Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa – had already been a thorny issue for a group which brings together vastly disparate economies and governments.” (AlertNet http://bit.ly/YdsXJd)

Bosco Ntaganda Gets His Day in Court

Just one week ago, who would have thought that the notorious warlord of eastern Congo would be so very far from Goma?  “Standing before the International Criminal Court on Tuesday for the first time, Congolese warlord Bosco Ntaganda denied he was guilty of a long list of wartime crimes. Ntaganda faces charges of forcing children to fight as soldiers and indirectly perpetrating murder, rape, attacks on civilians and other crimes against humanity. He was officially informed of the charges against him at the hearing Tuesday in the Hague. The warlord said he was not guilty before a judge interrupted and told him he did not yet need to enter a plea.” (LA Times http://lat.ms/YdAUOy)

Security | | Leave a comment
Screen shot 2013-03-25 at 10.18.45 AM

Canada’s International Development Agency Is No Longer; Maybe That’s Not Such A Bad Thing

Since last Thursday, the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) is no longer. The Canadian government has decided to integrate the agency into the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT), which will now be called the Department of Foreign Affairs, International Trade and Development (Acronym TBD!).

Canada plays an important role in global development. It is the eighth largest contributor to foreign aid in the world, giving about $5.4 billion in official development assistance last year. A bureaucratic reshuffle in Ottawa could have profound impacts on the global development landscape writ large.

So far, this move has been mostly hailed as a positive step towards improving the efficiency and logic of Canadian engagements abroad, including by some of Canada’s most progressive and liberal thinkers. The integration of CIDA into DFAIT is a sign of the times – indeed, international development in 2013 is not the same as it was in the 80s, 90s, and, arguably, even at the turn of the new millennium. To be sure, famines, natural disasters, conflicts and poverty are and will continue to be issues that require humanitarian responses by a country like Canada. But in a world in which the most rapid economic growth is happening in developing countries; where huge strides toward improving child and maternal health have been realized in recent years; and where increasing local capacity, educational attainment and institutional changes are paving the way for locally-led development, the role of development aid must necessarily shift as well.

Most of the positive commentary emanating from Canadian analysts focuses on the potential for improved policy coherence. Since last summer, when Julian Fantino – a controversial, conservative career police officer-turned-politician – replaced Bev Oda at the helm of the agency, CIDA has been consolidating a shift towards increasing cooperation with the private sector to achieve development aims, and uninhibited about the need to ensure that development aid benefits not only its intended beneficiaries, but also Canadian interests.  In Burkina Faso, for example, CIDA partnered with Plan Canada and extractive company Iamgold to fund skills training and education projects in the country, a decision which has been fraught with consequences for the NGO. But these types of private-public partnerships, we know, can be very effective – if the right balance is struck between development goals and the interests of the private partner.

Indeed, as Roland Paris points out in his commentary for the Globe & Mail, integrating Canada’s development agency under foreign affairs, along with international trade, can be beneficial, so long as policy direction is clear. Furthermore, as several commentators and analysts have noted, having a rational, coherent, comprehensive approach to foreign policy which includes diplomacy, trade and aid is desirable, particularly given the changing face of global affairs and international relations.

In a way, the decision to integrate development into foreign affairs reflects an understanding that development aid is not a stand-alone activity on the sidelines of international affairs. Development aid has gone through many incarnations over the last few decades, not just in Canada, but throughout the Western world, and the current trend seeks to frame of development as empowerment and not as charity. The absorption of CIDA into the Department of Foreign Affairs should help reframe Canadian development aid in this forward-thinking manner, and should also help reduce siloing and improve efficiency and impact.

That said, for development aid to be meaningful, it should not merely be relegated to second – or third, in this case -  fiddle, and should not always be trounced by commercial or political interests. How this delicate balance will be achieved, and maintained, is likely the biggest challenge ahead for the new Canadian Department of Foreign Affairs, International Trade and Development.

[NB The Globe & Mail has put together an excellent feature on the integration of CIDA into DFAIT, bringing together some of Canada’s leading voices on international affairs. Highly recommended for additional perspectives.]

Development | | Leave a comment
Screen shot 2013-03-26 at 12.29.20 PM

Why Russian Authorities Raided Amnesty International’s Moscow Office

Ed note. I am pleased to welcome Joshua Foust to UN Dispatch. Joshua is a DC-based foreign policy analyst specializing in counter-terrorism, the former Soviet Union, and South Asia. His website is http://www.joshuafoust.com/ 

MOSCOW – On Monday, Russian prosecutors and tax officials demanded the Moscow offices of Amnesty International provide records for a surprise audit. It is part of a larger series of crackdowns on NGOs here that has accelerated after Vladimir Putin resumed the presidency last year.

Last year, the Russian government instituted new regulations governing NGOs, with particular focus on “foreign agent” organizations that accept money from outside Russia.

In March alone, Russian officials have raided more than 30 different NGOs, according to Amnesty International. In at least two, last week’s raid on Memorial and today’s raid on Amnesty, camera crews from NTV, a pro-Kremlin TV station, and accompanied officials to document and shout questions at NGO employees.

Much discussion in the NGO community has framed this new move as part of the Russian government’s attempt to stamp out human rights in the country – both Human Rights Watch and Freedom House have singled out Russia’s backsliding on human rights as a primary concern. But the crackdown also is taking place in a broader context worth considering.

The U.S. has taken an antagonistic turn toward Russia with the Magnitsky Act, which was attached to the repeal of the Jackson-Vanik bill that normalized trade relations with Russia.

The bill itself doesn’t contain anything egregious – it rightly identifies Russia as a human rights abuser and puts in place specific sanctions against the individuals responsible for those abuses. But by singling out Russia for censure, the U.S. opens itself up to well-grounded charges of hypocrisy, given the lack of similar bills targeted at Saudi Arabia or Bahrain.

That’s why the Russians pressured USAID into closing down its Moscow offices. It’s why U.S. democracy promotion NGOs NDI and IRI left the country. (Imagine the reaction if Russia spent millions of dollars trying to influence American elections the way the U.S. does so in Russia.)

Though also grounded in the Putin government’s own tendency toward authoritarianism, Russia’s crackdown on foreign-funded NGOs is also part of its response to the west trying to influence domestic Russian politics. That perspective helps inform the decision to go after human rights groups: they’re a two-fer, both antagonistic to the current regime and substantially funded by the west.

In the gradually escalating U.S.-Russia relationship, which is taking place against the backdrop of Putin’s push to consolidate his power after a surprisingly contested election, we should expect such moves to continue.

Rights | | Leave a comment
Screen shot 2013-03-26 at 10.01.10 AM

Map of the Day: Where Same Sex Marriage is Legal

The United States Supreme Court is hearing arguments today in a case that could decide whether or not same sex marriages become legal in every corner of the United States. Right now, only nine states, plus the District of Columbia allow same sex marriage while 31 states have amended their constitutions to specifically prohibit it.  A Supreme Court ruling in favor of marriage equality could very well make marriage equality the law of the land.

That would be a huge step forward for human rights in the United States. But the global cause of marriage equality — and even of basic human rights for the LGBT community —  is still a work in progress. The map below shows where Same Sex Marriage is legal–and where being a homosexual can result in the death penalty. The map comes via White Knot, which notes:

Same sex marriages are legal in Argentina, Belgium, Canada, Iceland, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, South Africa, Spain, and Sweden. Many other nations have same-sex civil unions or registered partnerships….Note: Not shown on map, Nepal now permits same sex unions but does not have an official law.)

Rights | | 2
Screen shot 2013-03-26 at 9.11.44 AM

Top of the Morning: Indonesia to Override HIV Drug Patents; CAR Coup Watch

Top stories from DAWNS Digest.

Indonesia to Override HIV Drug Patents

Indonesia is set to implement a policy that will give generic drug makers greater ability to produce patented medicines. “The Indonesian government hopes to implement one of the largest ever examples of ‘compulsory licensing’, which will enable the generic manufacture of drugs still under patent…The latest use of compulsory licensing – Indonesia’s third to date – will allow the government to expand its access to the second-line ARVs, he said, including tenofovir, emtricitabine, and lopinavir/ritonavir.” (IRIN http://bit.ly/Yb8nZN)

Central African Republic Coup Watch: Rebel Leader to Name Power Sharing Government

The deposed president has fled to Cameroon. There’s looting and blood on the streets of Bangui. The international community may come down hard on the putschists. Now, the Seleka rebels must figure out how to run the country. “The leader of rebels in Central African Republic pledged to name a power-sharing government in a bid to defuse international criticism of Sunday’s coup that killed 13 South African soldiers and plunged the mineral-rich nation into chaos. Regional peacekeepers said that the leader of the Seleka rebel coalition, self-proclaimed President Michel Djotodia, appealed for help in restoring order after his own men joined in a second day of looting in the riverside capital Bangui.” (AlertNet http://bit.ly/YDThsf)

 

Security | | Leave a comment
Screen shot 2013-01-04 at 10.11.08 AM

UN Dispatch Podcast: What’s Behind the Rebellion in the Central African Republic?

UPDATE: After a few weeks of relative calm, the rebellion in the Central African Republic sharply escalated over the weekend. The president of the Central African Republic fled the capitol city, Bangui.  Francois Bozize is now reportedly holed up in Cameroon. In the meantime, there are reports of looting in the city, and at least 13 South African troops were killed in the melee.

As this rebellion was heating up a couple months ago, I spoke with America’s foremost expert on CAR politics, Louisa Lombard for a UN Dispatch podcast. Given the events of the past couple days, it makes sense to re-up our conversation. Dr. Lombard explains the roots of the political crisis and why the international community should pay attention to the escalating crisis in this poor, landlocked country.

Original post Follows

For the past ten days or so, a rebellion has swiftly gained steam across much of the landlocked country.  As I type, a rebel coalition is massed about 45 miles from the capitol city. Yesterday, the Security Council was briefed on the unfolding situation in the Central African Republic. This is shaping up to be Africa’s first conflict of 2013.

I speak with Louisa Lombard, the Ciriacy-Wantrup Postdoctoral Fellow in the Department of Geography, University of California at Berkeley who explains the roots of this conflict and what the international community can do to help mitigate this crisis.

Rights, Security | | Leave a comment

Diplo Tweets