Site Meter UN Dispatch - Page 9 of 1347 - United Nations News & Commentary Global News - ForumUN Dispatch | United Nations News & Commentary Global News – Forum | Page 9
Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size

All Posts

Screen Shot 2014-09-23 at 12.16.39 PM

The Big Policy and Financial Commitments from the UN Climate Summit

Ban Ki-moon, Secretary General of the United Nations, greets Barack Obama, President of the United States, at the Climate Change Summit at the United Nations in New York, Tuesday, Sept. 23, 2014. (Photo/Stuart Ramson/UN Dispatch)

UN confabs like this can sometimes devolve into gabfests that don’t result in much action. But what is distinguishing today’s meetings from others is that countries are bringing tangible commitments to the table. They are going on record —  before their colleagues and before the world — about what they are going to do about climate change. This is why today’s UN Climate Summit is so significant.

We are seeing two kinds of commitments: the first are financial ones. These are mostly going to the Green Climate Fund, which is an international financing mechanism to help developing countries grow their economies in sustainable ways. (The fund is a key lynchpin in getting developing countries on board with a legally binding climate change accord which will be negotiated over the next year.)  Additionally, developing countries are pledging to put their own resources to their own sustainable development. The second big kind of commitments we are seeing are policy commitments. Some of these are very bold–including pledges for entire countries to go carbon neutral by a specific date.

I’ll update this list throughout the day.

Some of the Big Financial Contributions and Commitments. 

-France kicked off the day with a big announcement. French President Francois Hollande pledged $1 billion to the Green Climate Fund “over the next few years. ” He added that this would be seed money that he hopes would attract others to the cause.

-Not to be outdone, Germany matches France and also pledges $1 billion to the Green Climate Fund.

-Danish PM Helle Thorning Schmidt announced that Denmark will give $70 million to Green Climate Fund, on top of existing $350 million

From the developing world, we are also seeing financial commitments in how they allocate their own budget. Here are a few examples:

-Sheikh Hasina, prime minister of Bangladesh, says they have raised $385 million from within their own resources to adapt to climate change.

-Papua New Guinea is spending “$150 million on regional Pacific assistance”

-Myanmar is  introducing a 30 year forest strategy “to safeguard a further 30% of our forests”

2) Notable Policy Commitments. Countries are Now on the Record. 

-The European Union President Manuel Barraoso announced that the EU has committed to reducing emissions across its 28 member bloc by 80%-95% by 2050.

-President Obama issued an executive order today to “incorporate climate change resilience” into international development. The order formally and officially directs all US agencies that deal with international development and multi-lateral diplomacy to integrate sustainability into policy and diplomacy around development. He also announced that the USA would announce new emissions reductions targets by early next year.

-The Prime Minister of one of those member states, Denmark, announced that it aims to be fossil fuel free by 2050

-Sweden’s Prime Minister also said he predicts a 40% reduction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions by 2020, and then down to zero by 2050.

- Belgium’s Prime Minister, Elio Di Rupo, says they will reduce emissions by 85% by 2050.

-But the commitments were not restricted to wealthier countries of the global north. Freundel Stuart, prime minister of Barbados said that by 2029, 29% of his country’s electricity will be green.

Mexico’s president said that by 2018, more than one third of electricity-generating capacity will be based on renewables.

-Trinidad and Tobago’s chief says 100% of its electricity is from natural gas.

- St Lucia sas that 35% of its electricity will be from renewables by 2020.

-China reiterated country’s goal to cut carbon intensity 40 – 45% by 2020 over 2005 levels and pledged to double its level of financial support to other developing countries.

3) Collective Commitments  Around Discreet Issues 

As the day progresses, there’s a third kind of commitment that we are beginning to see: joint action plans. These are public-private partnerships and other collections of governments and civil society groups banding together around a specific, common agenda.

One example: this afternoon 130 governments, plus companies, civil society and indigenous peoples signed onto the New York Declaration on Forests, “pledging to cut the loss of forests in half by 2020 and, for the first time, to end it a decade later in 2030.”

Another:  “Multinational oil and gas companies have joined forces with governments
and international environmental organizations to cut the emissions of methane.” This is called the “The Oil & Gas Methane Partnership.”

Big h/t and #FF to @Climate2014Live, which is compiling these commitments frenetically on twitter. When I wasn’t able to watch the speeches, I’ve borrowed some language from their tweets in an effort to be as precise as possible.   



Credit: Ban Ki-moon, Secretary General of the United Nations, greets Barack Obama, President of the United States, at the Climate Change Summit at the United Nations in New York, Tuesday, Sept. 23, 2014. (Photo/Stuart Ramson/UN Dispatch) 

Climate | | Leave a comment
Screen Shot 2014-09-23 at 8.32.04 AM

Airstrikes in Syria and Climate Talks at the UN

A big day here at the United Nations. Over 120 heads of state are coming to the United Nations today to participate in a one day summit on climate change. But with US-lead airstrikes in Syria underway, talk of terrorism and Syria will almost certainly creep into the conversation.

President Obama is addressing the summit at 12:50 eastern time. Just prior to that, Ban Ki Moon is expected to give a press briefing. It will be interesting–and exceedingly important — to see how he categorizes the legality of the airstrikes. Typically, a military intervention like this would require Security Council approval. That did not happen. But there are plausible arguments that could grant this intervention a patina of legal legitimacy — and these arguments matter inside the UN and for those who have sworn to uphold the UN Charter. I would expect Ban Ki Moon to address this question directly.

Meanwhile, hundreds of heads of state, key leaders, and — swoon — Leonardo diCaprio — are meeting at the United Nations to talk about climate change. The day kicks off at 830 Eastern with remarks from Ban Ki Moon, New York mayor Bill diBlaso, and Leo, among others. Speeches from Presidents and Prime Ministers kick off at 9am. Each country is formally slotted for four minutes of podium time, with three sessions running simultaneously. If they stay on schedule Obama will probably hit the podium in the early afternoon, around 1250 EST.

What’s this all about? I speak with Elliot Diringer of the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions who helps put this historic meeting at the United Nations in the larger context of international climate change diplomacy. It’s a 20 minute conversation that gives good background on the significance of today’s meeting and previews what we should expect to come of it all. 

All the statements







Climate | | Leave a comment

Tackling the Syrian Crisis at #CGI2014

The opening plenary of the annual Clinton Global Initiative meeting kicked off today featuring discussion with World Bank President Jim Yong Kim, IBM President and CEO Ginny Rometty, President of Chile Michelle Bachelet as well as Bill and Hillary Clinton. However breaking from the traditional focus of CGI on innovation and development programs, the session also involved a lengthy discussion with King Abdullah II of Jordan regarding the toll on states in the Middle East from the spiraling humanitarian crisis out of Syria, Lebanon and Iraq.

Jordan is a small landlocked state with a population of 8 million, the majority of which is made up and descended from Palestinian refugees. Since the start of the Syrian War, the country took in another 600,000 refugees from Syria, pushing the state’s fragile economy to the breaking point. Since then Jordan has limited the ability of new Syrian refugees to enter by closing unsanctioned border crossings but the strain of taking on so many continues to weaken the state.

This raises an important question that former President Clinton poses to the audience: If Jordan fails for trying to do the right thing, what consequences will that have for the region and for the world as a whole?

Although applied only to Jordan in this discussion, it is an important question with wide reaching consequences for the entire international community. As High Commissioner for Refugees Antonio Guterres noted yesterday at the Social Good Summit, there are more refugees in the world now than at any point since World War II. This influx in the refugee population comes as international aid agencies face severe funding shortages and a growing number of humanitarian crises to address. In the case of Syria, after three years of taking in refugees neighboring states have largely reached their breaking point but the World Food Program is now preparing to slash food rations for Syrian refugees, as they simply do not have the money to continue to support them.

Apathy towards the plight of refugees is evident in the policies of states around the world from the current US “border crisis”, “Fortress Europe” policies and the Pacific Solution in Australia. In this context it is vital that those states who do step up not fail for risk that it may encourage further apathy by those who can afford to help but don’t want to.

For Jordan the stakes are considerably more personal. The economic crisis exacerbated by the turmoil of the Arab Spring and Syrian War is starting to subside but Jordan still faces numerous challenges. Without oil of their own, Jordan usually relies on a deal with Egypt for energy needs but the political instability of Egypt has ground this electricity and gas production to a halt. Moreover, the growing instability in Iraq threatens to unleash another humanitarian catastrophe that will likely spill over into Jordan much as the Syrian crisis has.

To this end, the Clinton Global Initiative is launching a multiyear effort to support Jordan much the same way it did with Haiti in 2009.  Encouraging investment in renewable energy, initiatives for youth employment, better service delivery and humanitarian assistance are all ways to boost the capacity and resilience of Jordan, which can potentially serve as a model for the region.

Numerous pledges to aid in the humanitarian crisis were also announced, including the creation and deployment of modular schools to serve Syrian refugee populations by Pilosio S.p.A. and the creation of a resiliency fund by Global Impact, which aims to raise $1 million to help support other commitments made by CGI members in the fields of healthcare, education and job training.

Although the size of the problems coming out of the region seems unsurmountable, these are important steps. King Abdullah pointed out that the payments offered by ISIS  to foreign fighters represents an upper middle class income in Jordan and can be incredibly appealing for young people who often have difficulty finding work under the current economic conditions. Aid agencies have warned of a “lost generation” for Syria as children miss out on educational opportunities and lack access to mental health professionals to help them deal with the trauma of the war. By addressing the underlying motivations and problems fueling conflict in the region, Jordan and CGI hopes to contain a problem before it develops further.

Development, Security | | Leave a comment

Inspiration for Change at Social Good Summit 2014

As UN Week begins in New York City this week, the Mashable and UN Foundation Social Good Summit is in full swing. Changemakers, innovators, global leaders from diverse backgrounds are gathering again this year to figure out how we can end poverty by 2030.

The second day kicked off with a message of hope and action from UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, followed by an interview of Nick Kristof and Sheryl WuDunn, authors of Half the Sky, whose new book, A Path Appears, launches tomorrow. Kristof and WuDunn spoke about how their new work seeks to identify ways in which we can “spread opportunity” through well-targeted, intelligent interventions. They spoke about how they learned that researchers have identified early-life interventions targeted at infants and toddlers as having potential extraordinary impact – such as encouraging parents to talk and read to their children, the push for universal pre-K, improving access to primary health care for underprivileged new and expectant mothers and at-risk young children. Targeting very young children – when the “plasticity of their minds is still pliable”, as WuDunn noted – can help pave the way for success in the rest of childhood, and in life. This type of analysis highlights how more and more, do-gooders are relying on data, evidence and research to define, design and implement successful interventions to help relieve poverty and inequality.

Kristof mentioned a couple of times in his talk that this is not about finding a “silver bullet”, but about “silver buckshots” – lots of small interventions, which, combined, have an overall strong impact. The Social Good Summit  - a 2-day, action-packed event, with dozens of speakers and short panels, where everything from protecting endangered species, to drone technology and empowering transgender communities is discussed – is a good embodiment of this notion of “silver buckshots.” One of today’s speakers, world famous neuroscientist Dr. Jill Bolte Taylor,  spoke about how we are all “energy beings having an energy experience,” which is actually the perfect way to describe the experience of attending the Social Good Summit. Should your belief in the ability of humankind to affect positive change need a boost, I highly suggest connecting with the Social Good Summit – you can watch the recordings here, or check out the hashtags #2030NOW, #SGS14 and #SGS2014.

UN Week is a week “progress hustlers” (as Ben Goldhirsh, founder and CEO of Good, described the community of movers-and-shakers gathering in New York this week

Development | | Leave a comment
a photo of the UN building in New York, via Wikimedia Commons

The 4 Big Stories this UN Week

New York City streets are clogged. The Social Good Summit is uptown, the Clinton Global Initiative is in mid-town, and the eyes of the world are squarely focused on Turtle Bay. UN Week is here.

Here are the four big stories that will dominate the diplomatic agenda in New York this week.

1) The UN Climate Summit 

On Tuesday, hundreds of heads of state and key global leaders will descend on Turtle Bay for a one day summit on climate change. This meeting is not part of any formal negotiating process for an international binding treaty on climate change. Rather, it was called by Ban Ki Moon to help provide some momentum toward that agreement. (And the historic march in New York City on Sunday, in turn, was intended to build momentum for Tuesday’s meeting. )

That momentum is sorely needed. This will be the second largest gathering of world leaders to discuss climate change since the Copenhagen summit four years ago failed to produce a strong international agreement. The next chance to do so (perhaps even the last chance) will be in Paris in 2015. Between now and then, the international community will need to step up its game.  

Countries will likely use the UN stage as an opportunity to make policy statements and announce financial commitments that they will bring to the table during the heat of negotiations leading up to the Paris Summit. In particular, expect developed countries to announce contributions to the Green Climate Fund, which is a funding mechanism established by the Copenhagen accord to help developing countries finance their economic development in environmentally sustainable ways. 

(You can learn more about the diplomatic intricacies of this negotiation by listening to this Global Dispatches Podcast episode).

2) A Turning Point in the Fight Against Ebola?

The bad news: the outbreak is getting worse at an alarming rate. The number of people infected is rising exponentially, doubling every three weeks. The international response has been hampered by a lack of funding, lack of personnel and poor coordination. The outbreak was extraordinary. The response was not. 

But things may finally be turning around.

The Security Council last week held an unprecedented meeting on the ebola crisis, elevating the outbreak in West Africa to a threat to international peace and security.  The resolution, co-sponsored by 134 countries (the most ever for a UN Security Council Resolution), is an international call to arms against the outbreak and provides for a massive scaling up of assistance to affected countries. At the meeting, Ban Ki Moon announced the creation of a special United Nations Mission for Emergency Ebola Response to on-the-ground organization and logistic capacity to centralize the response from the UN system and NGOs that work closely with the UN.

The emergency session was convened at the behest of the United States and came two days after President Obama announced a huge scaling up of America’s ebola response. The USA is now firmly in the lead. And at least on paper, it has the backing of the rest of the world. The goal now is to turn the unity of the Security Council into specific actions that could help contain the outbreak. Expect UN diplomats to harness the momentum of the Security Council resolution for tangible commitments that member states can to bring to the fight against ebola.

3) Foreign Terrorist Fighters

An estimated 12,000 to 15,000 foreigners have flocked to Syria in the past three years to take up arms. Most of those foreign fighters have joined al Qaeda’s affiliate or it’s offshoot, ISIS. To put this figure in perspective, this number far exceeds the number of jihadis who traveled to Afghanistan to take up arms against the Soviets in the 1970s and 1980s—a group that included the core of people who later form al Qaeda. 

The prospect of thousands of would-be jihadis flocking to a war zone, then returning home battle-hardened is positively frightening to the governments of most UN member states. On Wednesday, President Obama will chair a meeting of the Security Council dedicated to stopping the flow of foreign terrorist fighters to and from war zones in the Middle East. This is only the second time in history that the a US president has personally chaired a Security Council meeting, which demonstrates both the priority to which the United States holds this issue, and the value that the United States believes the United Nations holds in helping to mitigate this threat. 

The Council is expected to pass a legally binding resolution under Chapter 7 of the UN Charter that compels states to do more to monitor their borders and prevent their citizens from taking up arms in Syria. The resolution also contains measures—again legally binding — to compel countries to counter violent extremism by undertaking policies that reduce the “push” factors that inspire would-be jiahdis to want to flock to war zones. In a security council that has been so divided over Syria for the past three years, this resolution provides a moment of unity around a threat that affects most countries on the planet.  No one wants their citizens to join ISIS. 

4) 2030 Starts…Now

The Millennium Development Goals expire next year. This year will be dedicated to replacing them. Or, in UN speak, setting the “Post 2015 Development Agenda.” The aim i set this agenda for the next 15 years by the time world leaders return to New York one year from now. 

“The general view is that it needs to be bolder, more ambitious and more transformational than the MDGs,” says Helen Clark, administrator of the United Nations Development Program.  So far, that seems to be happening. For the past 18 months, disparate parts of the UN system have contributed to the process of deciding what should replace the MDGs. This included a group of 30 UN member states from a broadly representative cross section of counties charged with coming up with a first draft of what will be called the “Sustainable Development Goals.” In August, this group recommended 17 goals, which includes eliminating extreme poverty by 2030, to be forwarded to the entire UN General Assembly for debate and discussion.   

“This set of SDGs says what we need to do,” says Hungarian Ambassador to the UN Csaba Korosi, who co-chaired the 30 member group. “Now, we need to decide how we do it and we have one year more to decide this.”  The 69th General Assembly is when that will be decided. That starts this week. 

Security | | Leave a comment

Turning Words in Impact with Women’s Rights

As the UN General Assembly meets for the start of its 69th session, the role of women and girls is a hot topic. At the Social Good Summit, several panels discussed not only the importance of gender equality but how to turn awareness into concrete action.

Two panels hosted today highlighted the importance of these goals as well as how we can move from simple words to actual results. Introducing the “rockstars of international development”, Juju Chang welcomed UNDP Administrator Helen Clark, former Education Minister for Mozambique and children’s right advocate Graca Machel, and UN Foundation CEO Kathy Calvin. All three of these women are on the frontline of tis struggle, but also represent women at the highest levels of international affairs. Based on their discussion it is clear how far we have come in advancing the rights of women and girls, but how much more is left to be done.

A second panel with UN Women’s Executive Director Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka, Tribal Planet CEO Jeff Martin, and Tara Abrahams of Girl Rising directly addressed how to achieve this. One result of the increased focus on women over the last 15 years is issue awareness is no longer a major issue; now comes the much harder task of bringing about actual, measurable change. This requires not only action by everyone, but also building a framework that allows us to measure what actions are achieving and where.

The overwhelming theme of both discussions is that while in a broad sense the status of women has improved since the creation of the Millennium Development Goals, there is still room and a vital need to gain more information and focus on the nuances of this struggle. While national statistics may show that child marriage is decreasing, a look at specific regions within that nation may still show that child marriage has not decreased there, or still exists at a much higher than normal rate. By developing a framework to measure these results on a local and regional level, not just a national and international level, we can gain a better idea of where more work is needed. But any substantial change will inevitably have to involve the other half of the global population – men and boys – in order to ensure the gains made are sustainable and inclusive.

This is the motivation behind the HeForShe campaign , an outreach program launched by UN Women to help men and boys form in global solidarity to support gender equality. Mlambo-Ngcuka aims have 1 billion men sign he campaign commitment over the next year to support women and girl’s rights, recognizing that women do not exist in a vacuum; by engaging with their fathers, brothers, husbands, friends and communities, the work being done on a global level can ensure that a rising tide truly does raise all boats, even in the smallest villages.

Engaging with men is just one way to bring concrete action to these goals but it illustrates the next stage in this fight. From working with Silicon Valley to create new data analytics to using storytelling to follow a girl’s story beyond a simple tweet, no longer is it enough to look at issues such as child marriage, domestic violence, and wage equality discretely; holistic approaches, with people taking personal responsibility and personal commitments, is what is needed now.

Development, Rights, Women | | Leave a comment

Diplo Tweets