Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size

Category: All

UN Conference on Trade and Development Launches in Doha

I am in Doha this week for the UN Conference on Trade and Development. Disclosure: UNCTAD’s PR firm covered airfare and lodging to allow me to participate in this conference. 

Doha, Qatar -  UNCTAD, the UN Conference on Trade and Development officially opens its 13th meeting in Doha on April 21st with an opening plenary. In advance of that opening, the conference held a press conference today with the Secretary General of UNCTAD and the President of the 66th Session of the UN General Assembly.

Secretary General Panitchpakdi presented an impassioned defense of UNCTAD and its mandate. He spoke of the need for global cooperation, and UNCTAD’s role in speaking for the poorest countries. Speaking about globalization, he said “This is a race that should not have winners and losers. This is a race that everyone should win. But everyone cannot win. This is about us being a voice for the people, and nations, that do not win.” He went on to call for more policy space for developing countries to exert government control over their economies. Specifically, Paitchpakdi mentioned the need to nationalize industries.

The Secretary-General also presented four lessons that the global economy must learn from the financial crises of the last few years. 1) “We need to look at regulating markets. The market doesn’t always get development right,” 2) “Look at the role of the state. Governments can’t always rely on taxes when the financial system goes to excess,” 3) “Finance should not only enrich finance-related entities,” and 4) “We need collective efforts to tackle global finance, and we’re not seeing them.”

Panitchpakdi described UNCTAD as an essential forum for economic thought and a body for cooperation that would not otherwise occur. He stated that financial change can’t occur in a single country alone; there are spillover effects. Finally, he called for major changes to financial regulatory systems, “We don’t need to reform financial architecture, we need to invent it.”

Overall, this speech represented many of the themes UNCTAD is best known for. It was an attack on the Washington consensus and a call for a new approach to global finance. Without explicitly mentioned it, the speech also rebutted the efforts of wealthy countries to reduce UNCTAD’s mandate and reserve international financial issues for the World Bank and the IMF.

Posted in Development | Topics: | Leave a comment

Map of the Day, Earth Day Edition: Epic Drought in USA

It’s nearly Earth Day here in the United States. Much of the writing and commentary about climate change you hear from sources like UN Dispatch or other globally focused writers and publications tend to focus on the dramatic effects of climate change in the developing world. We focus on things like the expanding Sahara desert; sinking small island countries; or unreliable rains, which leads to drought, which leads to famine and conflict.

But climate change is a universal phenomenon. It is not just something that happens over there. It happens here, too! Perhaps the most dramatic example of climate change affecting the health, wealth and prosperity of a rich country is the epic drought in some parts of the United States, particularly the South West and South East.

Look at this map. Darker colors = Worse drought.

 

NPR has done an excellent job reporting on the drought crisis, particularly as it affects Texas. I encourage people to check out their page and play with some of the interactive features. Some numbers that stand out to me: there’s been $7.62 billion in agriculture losses; $3.23 billion in cattle sector losses; $2.2 billion in cotton production damage in Texas. In total we, are talking about $13 billion in economic damage from this drought. For comparison, that’s about the GDP of Iceland.

Perhaps its time that lawmakers in the United States realize that climate change does not just affect other people in other parts of the world, but is causing problems here at home. And, having made that leap, commit the United States to policies that can limit the harmful effects of climate change.

Posted in Climate | Leave a comment

Quick Programming Note: Ban Ki Moon Speech on Sustainable Energy for All

I will be at this cool looking event in which Ban Ki Moon is giving a keynote. This is the kind of thing that will lend itself to some live-tweeting, so check out @marklgoldberg and @undispatch for updates from the event.

The Center for Global Development is the convener/host.

Friday, April 20, 2012
8:45am–11:45am

This event has reached capacity. Click here to add yourself to the waitlist.

Worldwide, about 1.3 billion people lack access to electricity, while 2.7 billion lack access to clean cooking fuels. Meeting their needs is central to reducing poverty but relying on existing technologies would make runaway climate change unavoidable. UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon is leading a “Sustainable Energy for All” initiative that is built on his vision for deploying renewable energy, increasing energy efficiency, and achieving universal energy access during the next two decades. Can the Rio+20 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro this June help to foster a global consensus for action? What could the United States do to spur progress? Please join the Secretary General and other distinguished speakers for a thoughtful discussion of one of the world’s most pressing development issues.


Remarks by


Nancy Birdsall
, Center for Global Development
Nigel Purvis, Climate Advisers
Session One: Sustainable Energy for All & Rio+20

Timothy Wirth, President, United Nations Foundation and Better World Fund
Vijay Iyer, Director of Energy, World Bank
Moderator: Nancy Birdsall, CGD
Session Two: From Rio to Rio+20: A U.S. Perspective

Carlos Pascual, U.S. Special Envoy and Coordinator for International Energy Affairs
William Reilly, former Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Moderator: Nigel Purvis, Climate Advisers
Keynote Addresses

Ban Ki-moon, U.N. Secretary General
Christian Friis Bach, Minister for Development Cooperation of Denmark>

Posted in Climate | Topics: , | Leave a comment

Top of the Morning: Darfur Rebels Enter Sudan Fight; Big Refugee Flow in Sahel; New HIV Drug Guidelines from WHO

Top stories from DAWNS Digest. Sign up to receive the full digest directly in your inbox each morning.

Darfur Rebels Join in Sudan, South Sudan Fight

Another day, another few steps closer to all out war. This time, Darfur Rebels from the Justice and Equality Movement have apparently joined some sort of tactical alliance with the South. The Darfur rebels sacked Sudanese army outposts near the disputed Heglig oil field, which was captured last week by the South.  “Rebels from Sudan’s Darfur region on Thursday said they seized two Sudanese military positions north of the Heglig oil field occupied by South Sudanese forces. In fighting on Wednesday night, the Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) took control of the outposts 40km north of Heglig, said the group’s spokesperson Gibril Adam Bilal…Bilal denied that JEM forces were fighting alongside the South Sudanese, who occupied Heglig on April 10 and allege it was used to attack the South. Khartoum’s foreign ministry claims that international press photos show the Darfur rebel movement has been fighting with Southern troops.” (News24 http://n24.cm/HWJc59)

Dramatic Increase in Refugees Fleeing Mali to Mauritania

A warning from MSF:  “At least 57,000 people from Mali have entered the Mbera refugee camp in Mauritania since late January. Roughly 1,500 people are arriving in the camp per day, up from 200 per day on April 5. Thousands more people are expected to arrive. In response to the massive influx, MSF is bolstering its activities and emergency medical aid in the desert area, where access to medical care is extremely limited. Fighting between the Malian army, the Tuareg movement, and other armed groups is forcing thousands of people to flee to Fassala, Mauritania, located three kilometers from the border with Mali. “The presence of armed groups and political uncertainty in Mali is generating fear and panic among the people,” said Elisabetta Maria Faga, MSF field coordinator. “Refugees are primarily Tuareg families from the Timbuktu region. They arrive here exhausted after a two-day journey by truck.” (MSF http://bit.ly/IXNSZu)

WHO issues new HIV Drugs Guidelines

Several studies published last year indicated the value of the early adoption of ARV treatments for preventing the spread of HIV. These were big breakthroughs, and now it seems the WHO is officially adopting the early use of ARVs in certain circumstances. “New guidance from the World Health Organisation today marks a new and important step forward in the battle for “an Aids-free generation”, as Hillary Clinton and others defined the goal last year. Antiretroviral drugs have been shown not only to keep people with HIV alive and well, but also in groundbreaking trials published last year, to reduce the chances by 96% that they will transmit the virus to anyone else. So now the WHO is recommending that anybody with HIV who has an uninfected partner should be started on treatment straight away – and not have to wait until tests show their immune system has been depleted. The move could have a real impact on the course of the epidemic by reducing the transmission rate of the disease. WHO also calls for greater efforts to encourage people to come to be tested with their partner – in the knowledge that it is good for both. Only 40% of people with HIV know it. They risk their own health and will spread the virus.” (The Guardian http://bit.ly/JjOZOY)

Posted in Security | Topics: | Leave a comment

Are You Ready for a War Between Sudan and South Sudan?

The last time these two fought a war, 2 million people died. The stakes are considerably higher this time around now that South Sudan is an independent, sovereign country.

Khartoum has vowed to replace the regime in Juba (the capital of the South), which it also referred to with the dehumanizing (and mass atrocity-encouraging) term “insects.”  Word today is that Sudanese President Omar Al Bashir all but declared war on the South.

This is bad. Very bad.

It is the result of over a year of provocations by Khartoum and reactions by Juba.  The two have not been sharing their oil wealth for several weeks, which would have raised the cost of outright conflict. Khartoum has routinely bombed territory considered part of South Sudan, and last week the South Sudanese captured disputed territory, which just happens to be considered Sudan’s largest single oilfield.

There is no easy way out of this conflict. As this clarifying International Crisis Group report warns, Juba and Khartoum seem willing to trade short term political gains, for the long term devastation that a war might bring.

The one way back from the brink is for the international community to raise the costs of war for both Khartoum and Juba. The African Union is scrambling to find a diplomatic solution to this crisis. The Arab League is also intervening.

In the meantime, major global powers have an important role to play.  The United States holds considerable sway over South Sudan. Aside from oil exports, which are not actually flowing at the moment because the pipeline runs through Sudan, the South relies heavily on donor assistance.  China wields influence over Khartoum. If Beijing can convince Bashir that bellicosity is not in his interest, perhaps a solution might be found.

For now, though the logic and rhetoric of war seems to be winning the day. And that is scary.

Posted in Security | Topics: , | 1 Comment

Would ‘Plan B’ For Syria Require the USA to Bypass the Security Council?

Josh Rogin has a nice scoop about how the Obama administration is struggling to come up with a Plan B for Syria, should the current diplomatic push not result in a real let up in violence.

New options are now being considered internally, including another discussion of setting up buffer zones inside Syria, one administration official confirmed. The administration has also authorized direct contact with the internal Syrian opposition, including the Free Syrian Army (FSA), and at least one State Department official has met with the FSA’s nominal leaders in Turkey. [Emphasis mine]

The rethink comes eight months after Obama explicitly demanded the Syrian leader’s removal, saying, “The time has come for President Assad to step aside.”

His administration is still struggling to come up with a way to make that call a reality.

There’s a growing consensus inside the administration that the violence in Syria is not abating and that multinational diplomatic initiatives such as the plan put forth by U.N. special envoy Kofi Annanare not convincing Assad to enter into a political process to transition to democracy, much less yield power and step down.

Clinton hinted Wednesday that fresh options are under discussion.

“We are at a crucial turning point,” Clinton said, speaking from Brussels. “Either we succeed in pushing forward with Kofi Annan’s plan in accordance with the Security Council direction, with the help of monitors steadily broadening and deepening a zone of non-conflict and peace, or we see Assad squandering his last chance before additional measures have to be considered.”

The Buffer Zone idea, which was laid out in an op-ed by former State Department official Anne Marie Slaughter, would put the United States on a collision course with the Security Council. Creating this buffer zone, requires that foreign militaries invade Syria to enforce the buffer zone. This means war. And the only international body that can legally sanction this kind of agression is the Security Council.

Right now, it is very, very hard to imagine Russia or China would not veto a resolution authorizing war against Syria.

This “Plan B” would put the United States on a collision course with Russia and China, and also one of the very foundational pillars of international law.

UPDATE: John Kerry, who chairs the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, sounds the right note on the Safe Zones idea during his opening remarks to a Senate hearing on Syria.

Finally, we should weigh the risks and benefits of establishing “safe zones” near Syria’s border areas. Safe zones entail military action and would require significant support from regional powers, and therefore requires a more significant vetting and strategic work-through.  I believe the unity of the Council and coordination of the FSA must develop significantly before one could create those zones.  But our interests and values demand that we consider how they could be constructed and what this would mean for Syria’s neighbors.

 

 

Posted in Security | Topics: , | Leave a comment

Top of the Morning: Rhetoric of War in the Sudans; Iraq Blasts Kill 30

Top stories from DAWNS Digest.

Omar al Bashir Effectively Declares War on South Sudan

Yesterday, we noted how the African Union warned against the prevailing logic of war that is taking hold between Sudan and South Sudan. To that, we can add there is now a prevailing rhetoric of war, particularly coming from Khartoum As the BBC’s James Copnal notes, if Bashir acts on his word, it means Sudan and South Sudan are at war. ‘Mr Bashir told a rally at his party’s headquarters that the SPLM needed to be removed. ‘We say that it has turned into a disease, a disease for us and for the South Sudanese citizens. The main goal should be liberation from these insects and to get rid of them once and for all, God willing.’ The reference to insects is an apparent play on the SPLM’s Arabic name. He told the crowd that his message to the SPLM was: ‘Either we end up in Juba and take everything, or you end up in Khartoum and take everything.’” (BBC http://bbc.in/I5l8ss)

Blasts in Baghdad and Northern Iraq Kill 30

Yet another major, coordinated attack in Iraq. “Bombings struck several areas in Baghdad and to the north Thursday, killing at least 30 people in the first major attacks in Iraq in nearly a month. The violence stoked fears that insurgents were trying to undermine confidence in the Shiite-led government amid rising sectarian tensions. In all, officials said extremists launched 12 attacks in the Iraqi capital and in the cities of Kirkuk, Samarra, Baqouba, Dibis and Taji. Mortars were fired into the northern cities of Beiji and Saddam Hussein’s hometown of Tikrit, but no injuries were reported there. Nearly 100 people were wounded in the rapid-fire explosions that unfolded over an hour and 15 minutes. Half of the bombs struck at security forces and government officials — two frequent targets for insurgents still seeking to undermine Iraq’s efforts to normalize after years of war and violence. (Time http://ti.me/I8z7Bk)

Posted in Security | Topics: | Leave a comment

Mali; Human Rights and Sustainability; Disaster Reduction; and more

Mali: Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon today voiced concern over a fresh wave of arrests of high-ranking public officials in Mali, at a time when numerous efforts are being undertaken to help the country overcome the various challenges it is facing. According to a statement from his spokesperson, Mr. Ban called for the immediate release of all those arrested and urged the junta to refrain from any further actions that might undermine the effective restoration of constitutional rule in Mali.

Soldiers last month took control of the country and announced the dissolution of the Government led by President Amadou Toumani Toure. The political upheaval followed the eruption of clashes between Government forces and Tuareg rebels in the country’s north in January, leading to the mass displacement of civilians.


Human Rights and Sustainability:
Countries must integrate human rights into the upcoming sustainable development conference taking place in Rio de Janeiro, as well as its outcome, a top United Nations official stressed today, warning that not doing so will undercut efforts to advance socio-economic development and protect the environment.

“Strategies based on the narrow pursuit of economic growth without due regard for equity and related environmental, social and human rights considerations, will both fail in their economic objectives, and risk damaging the planet and the fundamental rights of people,” said the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay.

She said in a letter to all Member States that, regrettably, the draft outcome document of the UN Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20), fails to take sufficient account of human rights imperatives.


Disaster Reduction:
The UN office for disaster risk reduction today launched a new initiative to help cities across the world manage risk following the worst year on record for economic losses caused by disasters.

The initiative – the ‘Local Government Self-Assessment Tool’ – is part of the campaign to help cities establish baselines, identify planning and investment gaps for risk reduction and climate change adaptation, the UN International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR) said in a press release.


FAO:
On the eve of a regional conference set to begin in Azerbaijan with government ministers and officials from 53 countries and the EU, the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is warning that obesity and diet-related illnesses could emerge as major challenges for Europe and Central Asia.

The FAO report to be presented at the biannual conference also warns that as diets shift from cereals towards higher consumption of meat and dairy, the risk factors behind chronic, non-communicable diseases could rise in parts of the region.

The conference will also look at what agricultural policies can help boost crop production to address both food security and combat rural poverty, as well as how to improve agriculture’s environmental sustainability.

 

PGA: The President of the General Assembly, Nassir Abdulaziz Al-Nasser, warned today that economic growth that relies on unsustainable patterns of consumption and production is undermining humankind’s quest for harmony with nature and called for science-based sustainable development solutions.

“As a human race, we have the resources, the scientific knowledge and the know-how to save our planet,” said Mr. Al-Nasser in an address to the General Assembly’s Interactive Dialogue on Harmony with Nature, organized to Commemorate the International Mother Earth Day.

Posted in UN Direct | Leave a comment

The Reaction We Can Expect from the LA Times Photos of Misconduct by US Soldiers in Afghanistan

The LA Times has released a series of photos showing US (and Afghan) soldiers posing with the body of a dead Taliban suicide bomber. Like most cases of misconduct by US soldiers — like the Marine urination video — there’s outrage and concern. But in this case, the outrage will be more in the US and in the American media, not in Afghanistan.

Here are a few initial thoughts as to why:

- Afghans face bigger concerns in their daily life than a few pictures of US soldiers with dead insurgents, for whom there is little sympathy anyway. Concerns about the daily bread and survival, about girls returning home from school without being poisoned or harassed, about navigating the corrupt bureaucracy, etc. far outweigh the photos in a US publication.

-…which most Afghans will never get to see anyway, because most of them don’t have TVs and those who do, don’t have the electricity to run it. Only about 5 percent of the population has internet access. However, most Afghans have radios, so how the story is covered will matter; but judging by previous reporting of similar stories, radio coverage won’t really change anything and it won’t be much different from coverage on TV.

-The photos are, more than anything, about the United States, its (rightful) concerns about the troops’ professional conduct and its obsession, as it would appear to Afghans, with trivial moral matters.

The bigger question that no one seems to focus on is the mentoring faux pas of US forces, who started the photo session as Afghan soldiers watched nearby. The Afghan soldiers were later included in the shoot.

An even bigger question is the systemic issues in the US military that continue to allow for humiliating and dehumanizing incidents to occur. Incidents such as the Haditha massacre, the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse, the US soldiers’ Kill Team, the Marine urination video, the Daniel Chen case, the Kandahar massacre of villagers, the Quran burning, etc. point to systemic loose ends. Unfortunately, the US looks into each incident individually and has not yet indicated that it is taking the whole-of-the-system approach to tackle these incidents, which continue to occur at great cost to the the US and the communities where they happen.

Posted in Security | Topics: | 2

What the UNFCCC’s Christiana Figueres is Looking to Get Out of Rio+20

You have probably heard, by now, of Rio+20.  This is a major conference on sustainable development being hosted by the United Nations in Rio de Janeiro on the 20th anniversary of the historic “Earth Summit.”  There is a lot on the agenda.

I had the opportunity to speak with the Executive Secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change Christiana Figueres about her expectations for Rio+20. Figueres is the top international diplomat in charge of herding member countries and others toward creating a post Kyoto international climate change protocol. The UNFCCC is not hosting this meeting, but does have a key stake in its outcome.  I was curious to learn how the Rio+20 summit might affect the ongoing struggle to create a global climate change regime.

For the past several years, we have grown accustomed to climate focused meetings, like Bali, Copenhagen, or Durban in which pressure groups and governments have urged very specific outcomes (e.g. the precise tonnes of carbon that should be reduced; temperature reduction targets; specific amounts of money devoted to specific projects; dates by which agreements must be ratified, etc).

Figueres stressed that Rio is not about the nuts and bolts. It is about the big picture:

“Rio is not a technical negotiation. Rio is about a bigger picture conversation about what kind of society to do we want…It is about asking ourselves: do we want to be a society that on the one hand wastes natural resources and on the other hand has not been capable of dealing with poverty, or do we want to have a society that is more responsible in the way it uses natural resources and at the same time can effectively address poverty and growth in developing countries?”

I think this is a useful frame for understanding the significance of Rio+20.  This meeting is all about agreeing on a set of ideals. It is not about the specifics. Rio+20 is all about finding common aspirations about the environment and development that every government on the planet can support.  Agreeing on ideals can be dismissed as fluffy, but it is still a monumental task considering that every government is included in the process of ideals-making.

UPDATE: Here is the full audio recording of the media roundtable, hosted by the UN Foundation.

 

Posted in Climate | Topics: , | 1 Comment
Donate Now

Diplo Tweets