Site Meter Palestine’s UN Vote and the ICC Connundrum | UN Dispatch
Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size

Palestine’s UN Vote and the ICC Connundrum

I keep reading news and analysis that should Palestine succeed in winning UN General Assembly recognition as an Observer State it will strengthen Palestine’s case that the International Criminal Court has jurisdiction to investigate crimes committed in “Palestine.”  So far, the Palestinian leadership have been unable to convince the ICC that they have the legal authority to accept the ICC’s jurisdiction, so the thinking goes that a General Assembly vote would finally convince the ICC that Palestine is a legitimate entity with which it can sign agreements and all that.

What people don’t seem to be saying–at least not yet–is that should the ICC launch an investigation into crimes against humanity in Palestine, Palestinians will almost certainly be implicated as well. The ICC would not exclusively investigate Israeli crimes, but crimes committed by Palestinians (bombings, rocket attacks, that sort of thing).

The irony here is that since the Palestinians are apparently willing to accept the ICC, and Israelis are steadfastly opposed, the chances are far greater that a Palestinian defendant would end up at a war crimes tribunal in the Hague before an Israeli.  Palestinians are apparently far more willing to cooperating with the ICC than the Israelis. Remember:  ICC doesn’t have the ability to arrest anyone, it depends on the cooperation of local authorities for that. At this point it is far more likely that the Palestinian authorities would send a wanted suspect to the Hague than the Israeli police.

Something to think about.


  • http://www.facebook.com/eileen.read Eileen White Read

    Mark, what you aren’t considering is that the Palestinians are likely to take Israeli state-sponsored actions against civilians to the ICC, just as Turkey is seeking international criminal justice for the killing by the Israeli Navy of eight Turkish civilians last year [and one U.S. citizen] on the Mavi Marmara during the flotilla to Gaza. 
    If there are, as there have been in the past, non-state actors on the Palestinian side [e.g., the PFLP or Palestinian Islamic Jihad] who kill Israeli civilians, these heinous acts don’t constitute actions by the Palestinian government. And since the Palestinian government does not possess an Army, Navy nor Air Force, we are unlikely to see the sort of state-sponsored military actions against civilian populations that are the hallmark of Israel’s military actions in Gaza.
    The ramifications of the Palestinians gaining access to the ICC could also extend to the IDF on the West Bank, where the IDF frequently responds to rock-throwing by Palestinian youths with live rifle fire. Could this be construed to as a military action against a civilian population?

Diplo Tweets